Comments on: Google’s “go” simple & stupid benchmark (1st round: I/O)

By: Processor Benchmark

Processor Benchmark — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:18:12 +0000

Sweet…. This is what I’m looking for

By: trantaloid

trantaloid — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:23:37 +0000

Joe Gester, cant you fucking read? which part of “1st round: I/O” didnt you understand?

nice test btw

By: Joe Gester

Joe Gester — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:30:44 +0000

You aren’t benchmarking real go code here. You’re benchmarking the terminal IO code and terminal system. Systems programming doesn’t do much terminal IO.

By: stenyak.com » Blog Archive » Google’s “go” simple & stupid benchmark (2nd round: memspeed)

Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:31:52 +0000

[...] Thanks to Juanval for the suggestion. [...]

By: saghul

saghul — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:29:20 +0000

Nice benchmark! BTW I don’t absolutely like Go’s syntax, those braces, … and we’ve got Python, Ruby and lots of interesnting languages. Why would we want another?

By: juanval

juanval — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:02:10 +0000

warf! 7 seconds?? Holy crap!
But maybe testing for I/O is not the best benchmark

Could you try something like more CPU/memory intensive like this and see how much it takes in go? In C++, in my computer it takes about 13 seconds

int main()
{
const int BUFSIZE = 1500;
int in1[BUFSIZE];
int in2[BUFSIZE];
int out[BUFSIZE];

for(int i=0;i for(int j=0;j for(int k=0;k out[k]+=in1[i]*in2[j];

return 0;
}